Thank you for your comment – excellent observation.
The setup has since been invalidated, but the cumulative volume data indeed confirmed absorption around the 245 zone, supporting that institutional activity you mentioned.
While the 272.60 trigger remains the key structural level, earnings-season volatility can often compress or delay confirmation phases. When the next trigger event occurs and wave alignment supports continuation, the expansion can accelerate quickly.
I agree, 306.37 was an ambitious target, which is why multiple targets are mapped to account for structural progression rather than a single fixed outcome.
Let’s see how structure develops into the next phase — what’s your read on the current wave alignment?
Thank you for your comment – excellent observation.
The setup has since been invalidated, but the cumulative volume data indeed confirmed absorption around the 245 zone, supporting that institutional activity you mentioned.
While the 272.60 trigger remains the key structural level, earnings-season volatility can often compress or delay confirmation phases. When the next trigger event occurs and wave alignment supports continuation, the expansion can accelerate quickly.
I agree, 306.37 was an ambitious target, which is why multiple targets are mapped to account for structural progression rather than a single fixed outcome.
Let’s see how structure develops into the next phase — what’s your read on the current wave alignment?